About Me

Name: Rural Anorak
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Be Seeing You

I heard some very sad news today.  Patrick McGoohan passed away.  Who is Patrick McGoohan?  He was the Secret Agent Man (Danger Man in Great Britain) and more importantly, he was The Prisoner.   He will be missed.  He was not a number, he was free man.
Be seeing you.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

PETA at it again

This past weekend, I caught a story on the news that just made me shake my head. This story was yet another example of how certain organizations on the Left advance ideas that are just odd, attempting to force people to change behavior to conform to the Left’s narrow view of the world.
In this story, the organization was PETA. Yeah, they are at it again. This new idea is their most laughable; they want to remain fish. Apparently, they think that by changing the name “fish” to something “warm and cuddly” would cause people to eat less fish, so they propose to call fish “sea kittens.” 
 
PETA is getting stranger the longer it continues. Now there is nothing wrong with treating animals humanely; its common sense to do so.   Now where PETA gets wonky is in the extremes they promote. Actually, some of their ideas and suggestions could cause more harm, even death to the animals. I have heard suggestions that milking cows should be released. OK, then what happens to the cows? They need to be milked twice a day or they will die.  The milk will build up in the utter and unless it is removed it will cause toxic stock to the cows.  
 
Last year Anheuser-Busch was sold to a European company and there was some talk about the theme parks being sold. PETA announced that they were interested in purchasing Sea World and releasing the animal performers to the wild while replacing them with animatronics. This would be a disaster. Those animals at Sea World would not be able to survive in the wild. In all likelihood, they have either never developed or lost the aptitude for hunting. And in the case of the “face” of Sea World, Shamu, the first killer whale pod he encountered would be the last, as the alpha whale would attack the intruder.
 
The people who make up PETA and other Left-leaning organizations appear to mean well and have the “best intentions.” We now what is paved with “best intentions.” The problem is they do not think long term. In the two examples above, their thought was to release the animals. Fine, but what happens then? For all actions there are consequences and those must be weighed before a final decision is made. And sometimes the best choice is to keep the status quo. It’s not a perfect world and there are no easy answers. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Fairness Doctrine

 

Watching the news this morning (Fox and Friends), I saw a story about education at the collegiate level. The specific topic was how university and college professors use the classroom to indoctrinate their students in their Leftist/radical ideas. 

There is nothing wrong with individuals having their own ideas, be it to the Left or to the Right. I have a problem with indoctrination; it leads to “groupthink.” I would much rather gather information, and form an opinion of my own based on that information. My opinion may be correct or not, but it would be mine. 

The story went on to describe how these professors would attack students who offered opposing points of view. This is where I was struck by how hypocritical these professors (and by extension other members of the Left) are when it comes to open discussion. These individuals are the ones who support the reinstatement of the “Fairness Doctrine.” This doctrine is designed to allow for “fair” discussion of issues in the media, i.e. whenever one point of view is expressed (conservative/Right) they insist that equal time is given to the opposing point of view (liberal/Left). However, when it comes to a liberal idea being espoused they will not allow a conservative alternative to be advocated. The usual method of denying conservative thought is to call the speakers anything from racist to sexist to close-minded. But this begs the question; who are being close-minded? Are they the people who will listen to alternative points of view, or are they the people who shout down any idea that does not fit their world view?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »